Services
Clear technical direction for systems that need to scale, integrate, or recover from complexity.
Scope
Who it's for
Common questions
Decides how a system is structured so that it matches how the business works and can still be changed in three years. That covers system decomposition, integration and API design, data modelling, and the sequencing of delivery, and it means being accountable for those decisions rather than presenting options.
A documented view of the system as it actually is, the risks ranked by what they will cost you, a target architecture, and a sequenced plan to get there that a delivery team can act on. Where a decision is contested, it is settled with a working prototype rather than an opinion.
Usually one to three weeks depending on how many systems are in scope and how much of the current design still exists in documentation rather than in people's heads.
Rebuilding is right when the underlying model no longer matches the business. Refactoring is right when the model holds and the problems are structural or technical. The honest answer usually needs evidence from your data and a prototype of the hard part, which is quicker to produce than most people expect. See systems rescue and modernisation.
Yes. The intention is that your team carries the architecture afterwards, so they are involved in the decisions and the documentation is written for them rather than for a filing cabinet.
A five-day Operational Friction Audit finds out, and leaves you with a costed, prioritised plan whether or not you take it further with us. Book a short call to see if it is the right starting point. If it is not, you will be told that.